Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Good job LEGO. The kid looks thrilled.

On a related note, when did LEGOS become absurdly expensive? I've noticed that most of what they market these days are themed sets with price-tags well beyond what I can imagine the plain blocks used to cost. For instance - their Lego Ninjago series can command anywhere from $10-$30 for a little miniature figure - you know - the guys that are about 3/4 of an inch tall. What am I missing? Have they just figured out how to create artificial demand by playing the "limited edition" game, or have plastic toys suddenly got more expensive to manufacture?



The Ninjago and film tie-in Lego is overpriced, but the Creator range has been good value. These sets cost $5-$25, with 3 "official" ways to build each one and loads of make-your-own possible models thanks to a good mix of regular bricks, plates and fancy pieces.

The problem with the themed stuff is that it isn't really Lego. It's more like any other plastic toy - pre-built (or made from a few big pieces), not much replayability but "looks cool" on the box and in toy catalogs.

On the company - another anecdote - my son lost a piece of one set, I went through the "lost a piece" process on their web-site and to my surprise they sent it us, for free. Although given all I've spent over the years on Lego, I think I was due a 1x2 grey slope with grill :-)


They've always been absurdly expensive. Maybe you didn't notice it in the US before since the dollar was so strong, but over here in Europe it's always been pricey stuff.


There is reason for their seemingly high prices it is because of how accurately the bricks are built. They are meant to be a precise size to something like 0.002 mm and you can see it is a quality product compared to Mega Blocks which just feels cheap.

I'd say a normal set goes for about $0.10 a piece, prices will go up if they require a license (Star Wars) or have lots of special abnormal pieces.

Minifigs cost a lot more to make, they are also collectable themselves. I have collected sets since I was three years old and I have only recently discovered how valuable and collectable just the minifigs are to some people.


Yeah, they may be expensive, but I've played with multiple "clones" as a kid and none got even close to their quality. Even the colors were often off.


Is it possible that inflation[1] has outpaced your childhood memories? Assuming 1990 is a mid-point for peak LEGO buying among HN readers, here's a couple of basic 'space' sets with comparitive prices:

6923 "Particle Ionizer", a small space ship: $24 in 1990 would be $42.48 in 2012

1616 "Space Combo", couple of minifigs and mini vehicles: $10 in 1990 would be $17.70 in 2012

[1] http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

[2] http://guide.lugnet.com/set/6923

[3] http://guide.lugnet.com/set/1616


I guess it's all about having valuable brand, IP and tie in deals with movies etc.

See also Games Workshop.


> I guess it's all about having valuable brand

Yet still people call it Legos :(


Haha. Yes, a quick lesson for those stateside:

Lego is the brand. One of the bricks is called a 'lego brick'. A collection of bricks is called 'lego bricks'. But there is no such thing as 'Legos'.


That's not how English vernacular works, sorry. LEGO is welcome to market its brand as an adjective, and English speakers are welcome to call them Legos, as every Lego-loving child and adult I've ever known personally does.


Normally I would agree with you; Language is open-source, people can adapt it as they like as long as they are commonly understood by those around them.

But not in this case. Definitely not 'legos'. Never ; )




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: