Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Their commitment to compatibility with old software was what crippled Windows in the first place.


Depends on how old. What I'm running and like would not have run on Windows 3.1 or PC/DOS but did run on Windows NT SP3 and Windows 2000.

But maybe some of that software would have run into problems on Vista.

Maybe Microsoft wants to assume that I will do my typing into Word or Outlook or Excel. No I won't. I type into my favorite text editor KEDIT. I keep my e-mail in files maintained with KEDIT and use Outlook only to send and receive, that is, handle the POP3 interactions. Maybe Microsoft believes that, sure, I will do my word whacking with Word. No I won't; I use Knuth's TeX and, then, PDF.

Microsoft thinks I like their efforts at GUIs -- I hate nearly all GUI efforts and make heavy use of command lines in text windows. The command lines run scripts I wrote.

I make relatively little and light use of the features of XP and still less use of Microsoft's applications. So, my security is not very vulnerable to any remaining security holes in XP.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: