The general response I've seen to that is they're encouraging more last-mile providers to be developed from Title II opening up the equipment poles/lines.
Basically, making it easier for the Google Fiber types to do their thing.
But then they have to live under the same rules as the big guys, and that was one of the rebuttal points. Valid or not.
I can't find any section of the rules that have to do with equipment poles/lines. Can you point it out?
Everything I can find indicates this limits existing providers, rather than opening any possibilities for new providers, and is thus likely to decrease competition/variety. That is, it's making local ISP service more like a commodity/monopoly than it currently is.
Basically, making it easier for the Google Fiber types to do their thing.
But then they have to live under the same rules as the big guys, and that was one of the rebuttal points. Valid or not.