The whole point of having ABET accredit programs is to standardize a basic body of knowledge. Curricula in mechanical, chemical, electrical, and biomedical all include solving DEQ and PDE systems. Solving those without Laplace transforms is cruel, once the basic principles are understood of course.
If it's just a goddamn title, then you wouldn't be so insistent on using it. You want to use it because it implies a level of education and professionalism. It's crass to use the title because there is such a thing as software engineering, and the people most strongly insisting to use the title don't practice it. Like I said, you can legally use it, but licensed engineers are rolling their eyes when your back is turned.
The very fact that you have a body accrediting programs means that there will be many schools serving up engineering degrees that are not accredited by ABET or one of its member societies, especially internationally. Are these people suddenly not engineers just because a licensing body has not bestowed their program the honour of accreditation? Just because there's an accreditation board does not suddenly make it the only ruling body on who can use the title "engineer". Unless it's actually illegal to be an engineer without being accredited by ABET, then their word really means jack shit.
> there is such a thing as software engineering
Which differs from place to place, yes. Not every program has been accredited but still provide software engineering degrees, perhaps with elements that would not be found in another's curriculum.
> and the people most strongly insisting to use the title don't practice it
Just because you don't have an accreditation does not mean you "don't practice it".
> Like I said, you can legally use it, but licensed engineers are rolling their eyes when your back is turned.
Good for them. They can roll their eyes all they want, it doesn't make them more right to do it.
Sort of; they were likely never engineers in the first place. Engineer is a licensed profession, like physician or lawyer. You can graduate law school, but that doesn't make you a lawyer; passing the bar does. In the US, it depends on the state, but the easiest path towards licensure is to graduate from an ABET-accredited undergraduate program. Some allow you to proceed to licensure without that, but it requires extra experience to compensate.
Some international programs. They don't have nearly enough capacity to accredit every single international engineering program all over the world. I'm sure they have the major ones down, but there's plenty that are probably not which still teach engineering.
> Engineer is a licensed profession, like physician or lawyer.
The license only gives you the right to call yourself a Professional Engineer. Like I said before, unless it is illegal to call yourself an engineer without being a PEng and being licensed, then the "licensed profession" part of it really does not matter. A company can require you to be a PEng in order to receive an "engineer" title in your role, but there is still nothing, short of law that prevents you from using it yourself.
> like physician or lawyer.
And they're both different from engineer, because those licensed professions are actually legally enforced, whereas "engineer" is not legally enforced everywhere.
No, the license allows one to offer engineering services to the public and the PE title is granted in recognition of that right. It is generally illegal to call yourself an engineer, but most people are able to use the industrial exemption. Nevertheless, in using the industrial exemption one is not offering engineering services to the general public. I don't know what happens if you tried to use the industrial exemption but offered services to the public, but I think it's prohibited.
This all varies between states, but in general, if you for example started a software consulting firm called Vlad Engineering and the principals were not licensed, your local licensing board would likely have beef with you. If you were a software engineer at Vlad Consulting you would probably be okay.
The bottom line is that it's tricky to navigate, and so it was recommended at my school we avoid using engineering anywhere unless we had our PE license.
"Engineer" is legally enforced everywhere. If you don't believe me, try to get a building built without having a licensed Civil Engineer sign off on the blueprints.
The whole point of having ABET accredit programs is to standardize a basic body of knowledge. Curricula in mechanical, chemical, electrical, and biomedical all include solving DEQ and PDE systems. Solving those without Laplace transforms is cruel, once the basic principles are understood of course.
If it's just a goddamn title, then you wouldn't be so insistent on using it. You want to use it because it implies a level of education and professionalism. It's crass to use the title because there is such a thing as software engineering, and the people most strongly insisting to use the title don't practice it. Like I said, you can legally use it, but licensed engineers are rolling their eyes when your back is turned.