No, that's awful. Right now "worthless unwanted crap" cleanly self-identifies it... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		bcoates on Nov 3, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: HTTP/2 all the things No, that's awful. Right now "worthless unwanted crap" cleanly self-identifies itself by hostname, so I can opt-out trivially with a browser extension. Hosting it alongside the content makes that much harder.

icebraining on Nov 3, 2014 [–]

Fair enough, that's a good objection. And I suppose nowadays when third-party cookies are commonly blocked, the benefits are more limited anyway.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact