Please read my comment and point out where I typed "antibiotics" or any other term commonly understood to mean that class of drugs.
I'm slightly dyslexic, and my brain must be scrambling the word, because when I read through it again, I don't see it.
> The down voters believe your characterisation of them as utterly stupid
Then they've proved me right. The correct way to show me wrong is to actually compose a salient rebuttal, which would by its nature show me to be a fool. Hell, I might even end up so shamed I'd apologize. The only conclusion possible though is that they knew they could not do this and did not make the attempt like the cowards that they are.
> and adds nothing to the thread.
How can it not add to the thread? Well, unless you want the thread to be an echo chamber and demand conformity of opinion.
Please read my comment and point out where I said that you typed "antibiotics" or any other term commonly understood to mean that class of drugs.
Or don't, because I didn't and you didn't and that's irrelevant.
The original post implies that American beef has added hormones and antibiotics compared to European beef, and the person posting considers that to be worse quality. A common concern is the addition of growth hormones and growth promoting antibiotics and the effect that might have in the food chain and the people eating it and so on.
Your statement that cows are animals with hormones doesn't touch on any of that, and your implication that people are only downvoting you because they think cows do not have hormones and refusing to prove you wrong because they're cowards is ridiculous trolling.
The down voters believe your characterisation of them as utterly stupid is misplaced and adds nothing to the thread.