> just existing costs the world "100 externality". If living to the fullest costs "110 externality"...
110, OK, here your point makes some sense. But what about when living to the fullest costs "850+ externality"? (e.g. compare mean oil consumption per capita US vs China).
If we're going to use this argument, at least let's be honest about it: we are not at 110, and our motility is not the problem.
110, OK, here your point makes some sense. But what about when living to the fullest costs "850+ externality"? (e.g. compare mean oil consumption per capita US vs China).
If we're going to use this argument, at least let's be honest about it: we are not at 110, and our motility is not the problem.