Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just because the same thing can be invented independently doesn't mean the system is ridiculous. In fact, it's the very fact that the system relies on to create research competition.

Being the Vringo is the motivation to invent things before the competition does.



Alternatively, it creates a motivation to not even try in the first place. If you've come up with an idea, there's a good chance someone else has as well. Why work on an invention if there's (1) a very good chance that someone else will get there first and (2) this will force you to toss all your work out the window, even if your implementation is better.

Moreover, the current system creates a perverse incentive to obfuscate your patent. Although all patents are (eventually) published, there's no requirement that they be published in a manner that's useful (no source code) or discoverable (non-standard jargon). The incentive is not always to make the patent well known until after a party has already invested significant resources into an enterprise, at which point the patent can be used for something pretty close to extortion.


You seemed to have missed the part where Vringo bought the patents from Lycos, a company google killed on the open market by, in your terms, doing better research.


The inventor Ken Lang sold to Lycos and bought back. He is the CTO at Vringo. See the comments after the original article.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: