Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a lot easier to get a law passed then to get it revoked, because revoking a law would suggest admitting some sort of mistake, and that's pretty much a political impossibility. So once a law gets into place it's damn near impossible to get rid of it.

I think a large part of the reason pot is still mostly illegal is because no politician wants to be the guy to say "wow what a massive fuckup we've made".



This is a case where mixing up then and than makes a difference


For a good example of this phenomena see alcohol prohibition in the USA

Passed an amendment to make it illegal

Then passed an amendment to make it legal

Instead of revoking/cancelling/etc to the first one


The only way to "revoke/cancel" (repeal) an amendment is to issue a new amendment repealing a previous amendment, which is precisely what the 21st Amendment does.

Think of it like git version history: even a revert is actually a new commit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: