Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some people live without a home at all. That doesn't mean it's a healthy way to raise kids.


Are you comparing living without a home to living in a small apartment in a major city?

Given people seemed to raise kids and survive in 983 sq ft during the 1950s (average house size) I don't see why people think we need massive houses to raise children in today.


Are you comparing living without a home to living in a small apartment in a major city?

No he's saying that an environment being "survivable" isn't an argument for what should be an acceptable environment for everyone.


Yes, but I was using the definition of "small" from your previous post: 300 sq ft, not 900+ sq. ft.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: