> Part of his campaign platform was, "Less measuring, no more charter schools, no more closing failing schools." I fear for the future of NYC schools.
All of those things are positives for NYC, not negatives. Closing failing schools has equated to closing schools in communities comprised of black and hispanic people and replacing them with charter school options that have less accountability. Charter schools themselves have not been shown to be a suitable large scale replacement for the public school system and have their own issues. As for measuring, the strictness of standardized tests and how they tie into student and teacher performance/evaluation has already been shown to be having an negative effect on classrooms.
Yes. And more accountable. The waiting lists are huge for charter schools. Why not give the parents more options for their kids? As a parent, I would prefer results like these, to the results of failing schools.
Partially or wholly publicly funded, yes. Publicly operated or administered, no. The part about operation and administration is the key point about parents and communities being able to have input into their children's schooling. Charter schools don't address the existing problems with public education in regards to many communities being able to have a voice in achieving quality education.
> Partially or wholly publicly funded, yes. Publicly operated or administered, no.
In many cases, charter schools are both publicly funded and administer. The charter is a governing document providing exceptions and alternatives to the governing rules otherwise applicable to public schools.
Charter schools may be privately operated/administered, but that's not universally the case.
Charter schools don't address the existing problems with public education in regards to many communities being able to have a voice in achieving quality education.
Yes they do. You always have a choice of charter school or non-charter school. Many charters are so popular that they have 10 applicants for every spot. This isn't the sign of a lack of a voice, it's a sign of people voicing their displeasure with their terrible zoned schools.
We allow airlines to compete for our business, and the bad ones should close. We allow grocery stores to compete for our business, and the bad ones should close. Why not allow schools to compete for business and let them close?
Charters have more accountability than district public schools. If a charter misses it's #s, it won't get renewed. Every 5 years they have to prove themselves.
All of those things are positives for NYC, not negatives. Closing failing schools has equated to closing schools in communities comprised of black and hispanic people and replacing them with charter school options that have less accountability. Charter schools themselves have not been shown to be a suitable large scale replacement for the public school system and have their own issues. As for measuring, the strictness of standardized tests and how they tie into student and teacher performance/evaluation has already been shown to be having an negative effect on classrooms.