To be pedantic, those aren't really 'reversed transactions' so much as 'data loss'. It's not like specific transactions were targeted. If a bank incorrectly recorded a credit card purchase of yours, you wouldn't classify it as 'a reversed transaction'.

If your transaction gets orphaned you can just broadcast it again.

If the goods you purchased are already in your hands, and your bitcoin payment has been lost in a blockchain accident, what is your incentive to rebroadcast your bitcoin payment?

That's why this thread is discussing m-of-n and escrow. But since transactions are public anyone (like the recipient) could rebroadcast it.

Honor my friend, honor. Unfortunately I find myself sorely lacking.