Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I assumed they had redundant servers with consensus algorithms in place in finance but apparently they don't. Would it be impractical?


Yes- latency is a big issue for this type of trading system.


Perhaps you could do consensus checking retrospectively? I.e., out of N supposedly identical servers a random one gets to make any given decision in real time but then a separate system goes back and compares all servers' results and stops their operation if there's divergence?


I guess, but it's more typical to do something like cap the total trading volume, position, risk limits etc. It's a more fundamental check on what you are doing.


Maybe the extra step in the workflow prohibits HFT?


Ya, I just assumed they would have at least 3 levels of redundancy, or at least a person there who could pull 8 cords?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: