> Anything that threatens that status quo is usually immediately dismissed. For instance, the idea that teachers should be evaluated based on student outcomes is like kryptonite to union leadership.
Its kryptonite to union leadership because student outcomes involve more than just what teachers control, including what administrators control and how administrators interact with the individual students. No one wants to be held accountable for outcomes when someone else -- particularly their counterparty in the relevant contract -- has the ability to interfere with their ability to influence the outcome.
Its kryptonite to union leadership because student outcomes involve more than just what teachers control, including what administrators control and how administrators interact with the individual students. No one wants to be held accountable for outcomes when someone else -- particularly their counterparty in the relevant contract -- has the ability to interfere with their ability to influence the outcome.