Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Rather than have everyone in this thread call someone from your list of food scientists at UBC, perhaps you could call one and post the conversation for us. This would be a bit less time consuming for the food scientists.


No need, here's a perfectly good breakdown from 2 months ago: http://www.businessinsider.com/rob-rhinehart-food-substitute...


That's not perfectly good, that's embarassingly and cringingly bad, and you should be ashamed of yourself for spamming it all throughout this page as if it were anything like a real rebuttal to Rhinehart. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5615708


Agreed. That article is so terrible it actually lends credence to the Soylent folks.


[deleted]


> I've demonstrated a simple way to do some due diligence. If people haven't done this themselves, then they are being fools. It's a harsh word, but that's the correct usage.

Have you eaten any food today? I assume you have or intend to. How many scientists did you consult before you did so? If it was none, then you haven't done your due diligence, and you're a fool. It's harsh to say so, but it's your own fault if you suffer ill-health through your laziness and stupidity.


No. I've demonstrated a simple way to do some due diligence. If people haven't done this themselves, then they are being fools.

You're willing to dismiss everyone as being fools for not taking the time to do what you're proposing, yet you won't do what you're proposing and post the results.


Mate we don't just have access to random experts. Do us a favour and support the shit you are saying.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: