I admit my first comment was a bit rough. My apologies.
My point is that this library provides the same features as Apache Mahout (that exists since quite a long time), so why duplicate the work and why not contribute to mahout ?
Duplicate features:
- Hadoop support
- RandomForest
- Generalized Linear Modeling
I would say the only interesting feature is the R support. So why not put R availability in Mahout ?
There is no explanations given although the existence of mahout is pretty obvious for anybody in the field. So without any proper argumentation, it seems that the authors voluntarily ignore the major concurrent tool in their fields.
My point is that this library provides the same features as Apache Mahout (that exists since quite a long time), so why duplicate the work and why not contribute to mahout ?
Duplicate features: - Hadoop support - RandomForest - Generalized Linear Modeling
The list of algorithm support my Mahout is way bigger than the one of 0xdata https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Algorithm...
I would say the only interesting feature is the R support. So why not put R availability in Mahout ?
There is no explanations given although the existence of mahout is pretty obvious for anybody in the field. So without any proper argumentation, it seems that the authors voluntarily ignore the major concurrent tool in their fields.