> I think you might miss the point here, in the same way as the KDE SAs did.
Who're clearly not under the impression they can't make mistakes considering TFA is a write-up of design flaws in a mirroring system :).
Look at it this way: If you think something obvious was overlooked, then it's good there's another report backing up your point. That's the value in everyone being open about their operations and experiences along the way - you only get better metrics for what works and what doesn't, in practice.
Yea, it is good to see a writeup like this. I'm sure some of the servers I work with don't have proper backups, but I was cringing all the same waiting for there to be a discussion about why the central git server itself couldn't be restored from a backup.
Who're clearly not under the impression they can't make mistakes considering TFA is a write-up of design flaws in a mirroring system :).
Look at it this way: If you think something obvious was overlooked, then it's good there's another report backing up your point. That's the value in everyone being open about their operations and experiences along the way - you only get better metrics for what works and what doesn't, in practice.