Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's no misunderstanding here. You're removing a feature which a lot of us use and pay for. This sucks.


GitHub is for source code hosting. Not tens to hundreds of MB binary hosting. Put your binaries in s3 and link to them from your project if needed.

They probably determined the excess bloat and strain on their infrastructure from git cloning huge binaries outweighed the benefits so they are removing the feature.


If that is all it is for I might as well host my own git repos too.


The downloads aren't stored in git. They're stored on Amazon S3. Every download link redirects to cloud.github.com, which is fronted by Amazon CloudFront.

Which, conveniently enough, is exactly what they want us to do ourselves now. I already pay GitHub to do that for me, how is it a benefit for me, the paying customer, to do that myself by hand?


Ah my fault then I misunderstood the blog post. Sounds like they are just removing it to alleviate confusion only then as the blog post states.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: