If you think there is even a 2% chance you're going to need a government bailout over the next decade, you simply cant be calling your product the grim reaper.
Especially when the chance they'll get that bailout is around 99.9999999%. That bag has already been got. Doesn't matter if AI ultimately turns out to be useless for anything but children's toys because the productivity it adds to IT work is exactly offset by the amount of bugs it both adds and has to find.
The psychopaths that are pushing it will be arguing over who gets to be president of the world in 2044. This arguing will not be done in any public forum, but over a grouptext.
> The psychopaths that are pushing it will be arguing over who gets to be president of the world in 2044. This arguing will not be done in any public forum, but over a grouptext.
I don't think arguing will be the method that decides it.
There's at least one of them who is openly talking about how important it is for him to have control over a large robot army (and I'm sure several more are thinking similar thoughts, just not blurting them out on social media).
> The psychopaths that are pushing it will be arguing over who gets to be president of the world in 2044.
I’m suddenly reminded of Metal Gear Solid 2’s plot …
In 2044, “the Patriots” AI will monitor the internet and the media, and “guide” humanity via manufactured consent with an unprecedented level of effectiveness.
