> The i965 driver is the only free software driver that supports OpenGL 3.1
And how does it perform in regards to ATI and NVidia cards?
Valve is surely doing serious 3D work, that is why on their Linux blog, they talk about a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680, not Intel graphics card.
And let's not forget that L4D is a DirectX 9 game level, so the requirements are pretty low in today's hardware terms.
> Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge are pretty respectable.
Not if you're blasting polygons. I have a dual core system that beats a Sandy Bridge system with the hands down, thanks to a NVidia GeForce GT 240M.
> You should reconsider your position.
Does the Intel's GPA finally support OpenGL?
Back in 2009 at Games Developer Conference Europe, I had the pleasure to talk with someone from Intel, stating that OpenGL support was important. This after hearing the guy spending one hour talking how to analyse DirectX with GPA.
And how does it perform in regards to ATI and NVidia cards?
Valve is surely doing serious 3D work, that is why on their Linux blog, they talk about a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680, not Intel graphics card.
And let's not forget that L4D is a DirectX 9 game level, so the requirements are pretty low in today's hardware terms.
> Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge are pretty respectable.
Not if you're blasting polygons. I have a dual core system that beats a Sandy Bridge system with the hands down, thanks to a NVidia GeForce GT 240M.
> You should reconsider your position.
Does the Intel's GPA finally support OpenGL?
Back in 2009 at Games Developer Conference Europe, I had the pleasure to talk with someone from Intel, stating that OpenGL support was important. This after hearing the guy spending one hour talking how to analyse DirectX with GPA.