Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Asking the US Dept. of State would almost certainly result in "huh?" from the folks there. The part of the USG that plays in the ICANN kiddie pool is US Dept. of Commerce (NTIA) and they no longer have a veto on what ICANN does.

One of the issues is section 4.2 of the IANA Naming Functions contract:

"[...] Contractor must be able to demonstrate that all primary operations and systems will remain within the United States (including the District of Columbia). [...]"

The Key Management Facilities are considered a part of the "primary operations and systems". IIRC, this clause was included in order to move the transition of the IANA functions forward in the face of some resistance within the US government.

Until that bit of legalese is revised, there will be no movement on creating a non-US key management facility. I believe changing the IANA Functions contract requires the Customer Standing Committee. As far as I am aware, no one within the CSC thought it worth the effort, i.e., "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

Perhaps under the current US administration, that feeling as changed, but I haven't heard of any significant efforts in that regard.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: