Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> People who voted for Brexit didnt vote because of GDP and Investments.

Nevertheless they got the opposite of what they voted for, besides lower GDP and investments.



And the ones who tipped the scale are already dead based on voting by age cohort. Like ordering dinner and dipping out before they’ve served the meal.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36616028


How do you decide which were the 2% that tipped the scale? Could have been the 18-22 years old too, no? Could have been any cohort, it’s a mathematical fallacy to pretend otherwise I feel.


This has been the sentiment at the time, I suppose coming from the percentages in the cohorts:

> 64% of over-65s voted for Brexit - compared with 71% of under-25s who voted Remain

Source and more context: "Vince Cable: Young 'shafted' over Brexit" https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-40842017


Every democratic country gets a government they deserve


Well if your definition of “what a democratic country deserves” is “their current government”, then yes, but it does feel a little circular.

If not, how do you define what a democratic country “deserves”?


Not really? There are multiple forms of democratic systems. The one utilised by the UK doesn’t appear to be very good, producing sub par results.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: