Say what you will about patent abuses, a firm that is utilizing their patents is qualitatively different than some shitballs in a two person office in Houston suing for damages of a patent vultured at some tech company's bankruptcy proceedings.

Hey, they paid someone for those patents. Someone who would not have been paid anyway. Do the inventors not deserve compensation?

A windfall profits tax on transferred IP would be interesting, so IV and the like couldn't suck all the value out of the tech industry.

I think an "exercise or surrender" sort of clause would do wonders. Of course, the patent system is brutally complicated and rife with unintended consequences, so tinkering with it is pretty fraught. The world isn't a theorem to be proved, there's no right answer. We all have to learn to deal with ambiguity better.

Well this entire trial and damages awarded have to do with a long series of wilful copying on Samsung's part, not just pinch to zoom.

Just because Samsung perhaps did something morally or legally questionable it doesn't make the patent insanity any less insane.