Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it surprising? Hmm perhaps nope. But is it better than cursor etc? Hmm perhaps it’s a wrong question.

Feels like codex is for product managers to fix bugs without touching any developer resources. Then it’s insanely surprising!



I've been contracting with a startup. The bottleneck is not the lack of tools; it's agency. There's so much work, it becomes work to assign and organize work.

But now who's going to do that work? Still engineers.


It sounds nice, but are product managers able to spot regressions or other potential issues (performance, data protection, legal, etc) in the codex result?


If codex can analyze the whole code base, I can’t see why not? I can even imagine one can set up a CI task that any committed code must pass all sort of legal/data protection requirements too


Exactly this. In fact the product manager should be the one that knows what the set of checks that need to be done over the code base. You need a dev though to do make sure the last mile is doing what you expect it to do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: