> It’s not an analogy. It’s another example of ownership in another context.
Right, and it shows that ownership isn't the one factor that matters.
> Employee’s authority over something owned by another party is delegated by that party and varies according to the trust from that management. Employees do not own goods or services they have produced and sold. And do not continue to have authority or rights to them.
It's not like delegation is optional.
But more importantly, the suggestion had nothing to do with ownership. The suggestion was voting power.
I am glad you seem to have stepped back from the "someone else built" language you originally used.
> The details of this are defined in the employment contract. Which tends not to include voting rights in regards to the owner’s property.
And sometimes it's good to negotiate parts of employment contracts as a whole society, by putting it into law. It's not "entitlement" in any derogatory sense. It's a very mild limit on which things can be negotiated.
Right, and it shows that ownership isn't the one factor that matters.
> Employee’s authority over something owned by another party is delegated by that party and varies according to the trust from that management. Employees do not own goods or services they have produced and sold. And do not continue to have authority or rights to them.
It's not like delegation is optional.
But more importantly, the suggestion had nothing to do with ownership. The suggestion was voting power.
I am glad you seem to have stepped back from the "someone else built" language you originally used.
> The details of this are defined in the employment contract. Which tends not to include voting rights in regards to the owner’s property.
And sometimes it's good to negotiate parts of employment contracts as a whole society, by putting it into law. It's not "entitlement" in any derogatory sense. It's a very mild limit on which things can be negotiated.