>Seems like a typical mythos of most political movements these days, doesn't it? E.g., "the far-right is our greatest threat".

>Though I'm sure right-wing groups believe themselves to be tolerant of one-another and their allies and others with similar aims, and that groups that oppose them are intolerant and therefore must be met with intolerance.

>Other side will call them intolerant racists too, it is also pretty clear to them.

These would be the statements where they were creating a false equivalence. The things being compared are not equivalent but they are given rhetorical treatment to make them seem equivalent.

From what I can tell, they simply made an observation. You're the one applying a value judgment to their statements. Pointing out that different tribes use rhetoric to "other" outsiders isn't creating a false equivalence.

Congrats, you've bought into the fascist's messaging.

You're very intolerant of people discussing this subject.

Denouncing and accusing people as fascists who must not be tolerated for the transgression of discussing social and political issues in a manner deemed verboten seems like something a fascist might do.