It provides examples of unacceptable risks — they're in the article.
And the obvious whataboutism is obvious. Yes, you can find other sources for information on, say, developing bio weapons elsewhere. Does that mean you should have systems that aid you in collecting, synthesizing and displaying that information? That with the right interfaces and actuators can actually help you move towards that goal?
There's a line somewhere, that is very hard to draw, and yet should be drawn regardless.
Wikipedia collects, synthesizes, and displays such information, and provides a references section for further exploration. How the heck can anyone justifying something that does that but in a chat format?
The threshold to building any of these save nukes is extremely low, and nukes are only high because there are fewer use cases for radioactive material so it's simply less available.
And the obvious whataboutism is obvious. Yes, you can find other sources for information on, say, developing bio weapons elsewhere. Does that mean you should have systems that aid you in collecting, synthesizing and displaying that information? That with the right interfaces and actuators can actually help you move towards that goal?
There's a line somewhere, that is very hard to draw, and yet should be drawn regardless.