Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the article: http://messymatters.com/expectorant/#EXP

"A common complaint about stochastic schemes is that they’re “only fair if you do it repeatedly with the same group of people”. That’s true if you insist on ex post fairness. We’re usually happy with ex ante fairness. Consider selling me a (perfectly fairly priced) lottery ticket for a dollar. That’s guaranteed to be unfair, ex post. Either you sold me a worthless piece of paper for a dollar, or I got a million dollars and only paid a dollar for it. But the fact that none of us knew which would happen made the one dollar price fair. Same story with venture capital investment, for example. You may need a gambling mentality to be down with it, but it’s quite fair even if only done once. The fact that it averages out in the long term to be perfectly fair ex post is icing on the cake."



Yeah, it says it's gambling. Even if it's mathematically fair gamling, that doesn't make it a "fair" way to spilt a bill.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: