Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Absolutely.

There's also absolutely zero sense that if there's any term based on the lifetime of the authors, that it should extend a single day after their death.

I'd definitely prefer a 20-30 year fixed term, but if it was going to be based on lifetime then it should only be until the death of the author.



The problem with that is some ridiculous edge cases.

Young book author agrees to a profit share agreement with publisher and works most of the time.

Has an accidental death at launch party, his work is in public domain now, and the publisher & author's family are in trouble ?

Or it simply makes publishers reluctant to work with old authors and be biased towards healthy young writers.


I don't have particularly strong feelings on this particular issue, but I do take issue with worrying about edge cases. By definition, edge cases are infrequent and unlikely occurrences. Trying to account for every possibility is a way of making sure nothing ever changes. It's a form of perfect being the enemy of good.

For this particular scenario, I would tell publishers and authors to take out a life or accidental death insurance policy.


Yes that's why it shouldn't have any bearing at all on lifetime, and why I prefer a fixed term of 20-30 years.


What's it got to see with publisher or family ?

Publisher takes risk every time they publish book, sometimes they loose money sometimes they earn a lot. This wouldn't deter them from publishing young author, maybe even the opposite because statistically they would have more chance to live long.

If I'm alive and I work, I provide for my family. If I'm dead then im not providing for my family anymore. why should it be different for authors ?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: