Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Also wouldn’t cover encrypted messages sent in the clear. Exchange keys ahead of time and you’re just sending noise to each other. I guess you could still target users sending random noise under the assumption they are using encryption.


Do you think they'd be trying to take encryption away if they weren't already inspecting the packets deeply enough to notice the difference between natural language and encryption noise? One has to imagine that the whole point is to read the underlying message, right?


It's extremely costly to deeply inspect terabytes of traffic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: