1. SAM 2 was trained on 256 A100 GPUs for 108 hours (SAM1 was 68 hrs on same cluster). Taking the upper end $2 A100 cost off gpulist means SAM2 cost ~$50k to train - surprisingly cheap for adding video understanding?
2. new dataset: the new SA-V dataset is "only" 50k videos, with careful attention given to scene/object/geographical diversity incl that of annotators. I wonder if
LAION or Datacomp (AFAICT the only other real players in the open image data space) can reach this standard..
3. bootstrapped annotation: similar to SAM1, a 3 phase approach where 16k initial annotations across 1.4k videos was then expanded to 63k+197k more with SAM 1+2 assistance, with annotation time accelerating dramatically (89% faster than SAM1 only) by the end
4. memory attention: SAM2 is a transformer with memory across frames! special "object pointer" tokens stored in a "memory bank" FIFO queue of recent and prompted frames. Has this been explored in language models? whoa?
A colleague of mine has written up a quick explainer on the key features (https://encord.com/blog/segment-anything-model-2-sam-2/). The memory attention module for keeping track of objects throughout a video is very clever - one of the trickiest problems to solve, alongside occlusion. We've spent so much time trying to fix these issues in our CV projects, now it looks like Meta has done the work for us :-)
> 4. memory attention: SAM2 is a transformer with memory across frames! special "object pointer" tokens stored in a "memory bank" FIFO queue of recent and prompted frames. Has this been explored in language models? whoa?
interesting, how do you think this could be introduced to llm?
I imagine in video some special tokens are preserved in input to next frame, so kind of like llms see previous messages in chat history, but it's filters out to only some category of tokens to limit size of context.
I believe this is trick already borrowed from llm into video space.
(I didn't read the paper, so that's speculation on my side)
I might be minority, but I am not that surprised by the results or the not so significant GPU hours. I've been video segment tracking for a while now using SAM for mask generation and some of the robust academic video-object segmentation models (see CUTIE: https://hkchengrex.com/Cutie/ presented at CVPR this year.)for tracking the mask.
I need to read SAM2 paper, but 4. seems a lot like what Rex has in CUTIE. CUTIE can consistently track segments across video frames even if they get occluded/ go out of frame for a while.
Seems like there's functional overlap between segmentation models and the autofocus algorithms developed by Canon and Sony for their high-end cameras.
The Canon R1 for example will not only continually track a particular object even if partially occluded but will also pre-focus on where it predicts the object will be when it emerged from being totally hidden. It can also be programmed by the user to focus on a particular face to the exclusion of all else.
1. SAM 2 was trained on 256 A100 GPUs for 108 hours (SAM1 was 68 hrs on same cluster). Taking the upper end $2 A100 cost off gpulist means SAM2 cost ~$50k to train - surprisingly cheap for adding video understanding?
2. new dataset: the new SA-V dataset is "only" 50k videos, with careful attention given to scene/object/geographical diversity incl that of annotators. I wonder if LAION or Datacomp (AFAICT the only other real players in the open image data space) can reach this standard..
3. bootstrapped annotation: similar to SAM1, a 3 phase approach where 16k initial annotations across 1.4k videos was then expanded to 63k+197k more with SAM 1+2 assistance, with annotation time accelerating dramatically (89% faster than SAM1 only) by the end
4. memory attention: SAM2 is a transformer with memory across frames! special "object pointer" tokens stored in a "memory bank" FIFO queue of recent and prompted frames. Has this been explored in language models? whoa?
(written up in https://x.com/swyx/status/1818074658299855262)