Again, I'm not disagreeing. I thought I repeated "I don't believe aliens are visiting us" in my comment often enough to make that clear.
I am only commenting on your point:
> Before camera phones were ubiquitous, the bulk of reports were very elaborate and fantastic tales where the so-called witness played a central role in the story.
> Once everyone started carrying a camera, all we see is questionable light shows taken from a very long distance.
> Strange, isn't it?
This argument is not based in logic. Don't argue against "aliens" and the like by making points that are not based in logic. Find arguments that are based in logic.
I am only commenting on your point:
> Before camera phones were ubiquitous, the bulk of reports were very elaborate and fantastic tales where the so-called witness played a central role in the story.
> Once everyone started carrying a camera, all we see is questionable light shows taken from a very long distance.
> Strange, isn't it?
This argument is not based in logic. Don't argue against "aliens" and the like by making points that are not based in logic. Find arguments that are based in logic.