> Why should he want to be productive? Does your company reward such a thing proportionally?
Companies rely on at least a minimum level of productivity from their employees. He had the skills to be extraordinarily productive, but he probably only needed to be 'ordinarily' productive, and according to GP, he was not.
> even though he had all of the skills needed to be extraordinarily productive.
Why should he want to be productive? Does your company reward such a thing proportionally?
I still think he is ahead of where he would otherwise be.