> the Lesser GNU General Public license, LGPL-3.0-only.
> we will not be making use of any sort of Contributor License Agreement which gives one entity special privileges with respect to the copyright and licensing of Redict in a manner similar to that employed by Redis®. As a consequence, the copyright over Redict is held in common by all contributors, who would all have to agree to a future change of license, making it next to impossible that a similar change of license is in Redict’s future.
It's a shame the FSFE's FLA (https://fsfe.org/activities/fla/fla.en.html) isn't used by more groups. It allows you to provide some rights to the organisation (e.g. suing for license violations on your behalf), while you retain all your rights.
> we will not be making use of any sort of Contributor License Agreement which gives one entity special privileges with respect to the copyright and licensing of Redict in a manner similar to that employed by Redis®. As a consequence, the copyright over Redict is held in common by all contributors, who would all have to agree to a future change of license, making it next to impossible that a similar change of license is in Redict’s future.
Splendid!