Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hmm, I'm not convinced.

The only geometry the knitting demonstrations justify is "pins around hole". I don't see an argument for the dodecahedron shape or the cast metal. A vastly cheaper wooden jig with nails would service just as well and offer much better ergonomic possibilities, like a handle. The knitting with the finger growing inside the dodec looks unhelpful and implausible.



> The knitting with the finger growing inside the dodec looks unhelpful and implausible

There are also examples without the big holes in, which would make knitting pretty much impossible.


> There are also examples without the big holes in, which would make knitting pretty much impossible.

Gloves for children?



Romans had mass production facilities for some things. Possibly gloves. So a durable permanent jig is not an unreasonable suggestion.


I think the objection is not about unnecessary durability, but unnecessary complexity; you don’t need so many faces to make a glove.


Unnecessary complexity & expense, and if it were part of a mass production process you'd expect to find them clustered in production centers or something. These are found scattered randomly and individually in graves and border forts.


If the thing was for making gloves, the faces would be for different finger sizes.


The holes in them are of different sizes.


The glove is inverted, the fingers are inserted into the holes separately and sewn into the glove using the pins.

When you’re done, you take it off and unfold it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: