> They won’t be able to accomplish their mission without external funding, though (longterm anyway). Seemingly what they did significantly compromised their ability to obtain it in the future.
Their goals are mitigating what they see as an existential risk to human civilization, and also delivering social benefit from a properly aligned version of the same technology posing the risk.
From that perspective, actively compromising the first part of the mission in the short term potentially renders longer-term financial viability and the second part of the mission irrelevant concerns.
Well chances are that because of this entire debacle they simply won’t have any say in it. So yeah if that was indeed their goal their hand will be “clean”.
But that’s it. The world will move on and at best they just delayed those “existential threats” by 6-12 months. If they thought this preferable to any form of compromise. Well.. that’s fine.
However I doubt this was even the primary reason of this whole conflict in the first place.
Their goals are mitigating what they see as an existential risk to human civilization, and also delivering social benefit from a properly aligned version of the same technology posing the risk.
From that perspective, actively compromising the first part of the mission in the short term potentially renders longer-term financial viability and the second part of the mission irrelevant concerns.