I'm not OP, but there's a few rules being broken there that I can think of:
- At the end of the trick, there's a reveal that wraps things up. In the case of escapes, it would be showing the magician safe and not actually drowned or eaten by sharks, etc.
- The "volunteer" is just there to be a surrogate for the audience, to verify some things, they're not _really_ involved in the trick
- You must hide that the volunteer is a plant when they are (they're not always). They couldn't do a lot of that stuff to some random person, so this rule is broken.
- The magician would generally not talk about eg how Houdini would have done that trick (even if I think they're intentionally mis-stating how Houdini would have done it, for most tricks there'd be absolutely no reason to use picks, you'd use a key or a faked lock or a faked locking mechanism, because why not).
It's an anti-trick because they're doing everything the wrong way around. The volunteer is the one that does the dangerous part, the magician isn't doing anything, the volunteer is obviously not a volunteer, the "trick" doesn't actually visibly show anything magical happening (visually, you just watched a murder essentially, no escape ... you only know it's an escape because they _probably_ didn't really just murder somebody for a show), and they "told" you how the trick was being done.
All against the basic rules of magic. Perfect for Penn and Teller, they love playing meta games and having fun with the rules of magic.
True, but in classical magic you should hide that fact as much as possible. They're intentionally drawing attention to it, if only over time (and you could still miss it if you're not thinking about it, so maybe I shouldn't use the word "obviously", depends on the audience I suppose).
edit: a more serious answer is that this is an escape trick, and generally when you do an escape trick:
1) The magician is doing the escaping
2) You _show the escape_
In this case, the volunteer is basically just shoved into the water and (presumably) drowns. The audience is left to _infer_ that there was an escape, if they choose to, or I guess they could infer that Penn and Teller are cold blooded murderers and got away with it. Either inference would be quite the good trick.
https://youtu.be/3m8DsQisjXQ?si=4x0Dhrf_2Byg_Bzh&t=958 (16 minutes in).
It breaks a fundamental rule about magic tricks that you probably never even realized was a rule until they fade to black.