Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hard to follow all the units, but, just for grinding, using these numbers:

grinding: ~14 kWh/tonne olivine

absorption: 1.25 tonne of CO2 per tonne of olivine

emissions: 0.855 lbs CO2 / kWh

emissions: 5.4 kg CO2 per 1.25 tonne CO2 (1250 kg) absorbed



> emissions: 0.855 lbs CO2 / kWh

Why do there have to be CO2 emissions?


There don't. The problem is a lack of remote industrial equipment that are EVs powered by renewable electricity sources rather than diesel fuel.


That's not really that much of a problem to be honest.

If this is to be an industrial mining scale operation that goes in with a 600 million tonne per annum target (similar scale to iron ore for steel mining operations) then the company building out the capital assets will setup EV's and solar on the grounds of both economy and PR.

You can see this with Rio Tinto Iron, Fortescue Metals, etc.


You could solar power it, or whatnot. I was just trying to contextualize the numbers others had written.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: