I currently work as a programmer but wish to leave and set up a company. I have an idea and I'm confident that I have a reasonable chance at making it work, however I'd be doing it alone.
Apart from work and some people online many miles away, I know 0 other programmers. I can't go into business with anyone from work due to my contract and, even if I could (perhaps they couldn't enforce that?), I don't think I'd want to. I don't know anyone here well enough.
To make matters worse, I a small city with very few technology companies and a lack of programmers. It may be quite hard to find someone locally who would be interested.
I believe it is harder to get VC when going it alone - is this true and does anyone have any experience with this?
Has anyone else been in a similar position?
Regardless, if you think you can get revenue without funding I'd say go it alone because you don't NEED anyone else and you can always bring people on board (even as employees) later. A business that can get a few thousand a month within a year should be able to scale up into hundreds of thousands in annual revenue through word-of-mouth alone. At that point you can live without answering to anyone else. The other route of taking investment and cofounders means you get locked down and need a much larger exit to have the same level of freedom.
If you can afford to spend $5 to $10k over the next six to ten months, you might want to look at something like Start-Up Chile. They don't take equity so don't have the anti-single-founder bias that seems prevalent elsewhere, but the social nature of the program makes the startup experience less alienating because it makes you part of a cohort, and the funding can be useful for experimenting with different approaches to distribution and marketing you wouldn't be able to afford as a bootstrapper otherwise.