> This is just legal cover until such time as its possible to enforce no child exploitation imagery, no copyright stuff, etc.

If the art used in a game violates copyright or contains imagery of exploited children, ban it of course, but what does that have to do with whether it was generated via AI or created in another manner?

If anything AI generated art should be _less_ susceptible to copyrighted stuff because everything is original (even if it's not in original style)