> wouldn't better mobile coverage at faster speeds be the thing to go for?
Maybe, but you'd still need to have fibre run to any new builds to put a transceiver there to get the high speeds and to not saturate the bands that the transceivers are operating in. You might as well run the fibre into the house and let the home owner choose what to do with it.
Perhaps, but new construction homes tend to be more expensive, and (anecdotally) in nicer areas. Regardless, the benefits are limited to the household (of two to five?). On the otherhand, better mobile is for all.
Maybe, but you'd still need to have fibre run to any new builds to put a transceiver there to get the high speeds and to not saturate the bands that the transceivers are operating in. You might as well run the fibre into the house and let the home owner choose what to do with it.