Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Anyone else think it was off to have several statements that decried having details that might identify staff. Such as:

> I have agreed to change their names and omit certain details to protect them

But then "Rebecca" has a one/two bridge walk described in detail and with personal description:

> She is in her mid-fifties, with a round face, angular Cubitts spectacles and searching green-brown eyes.

These things don't match. Either the service didn't care or it's intentionally deceiving - hopefully the latter if you want competence.



I fully expect that the service reviewed the article, and likely those interviewed as well to ensure they were happy with the level of detail disclosed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: