This journalist seems outraged that Netflix is hosting non-factual content. Hard to comport this with 90% of the content on the platform, which is clearly non-factual.
In any case, Hancock is presenting a theory, to which there may well be elements of interest to merit further investigation. As for 'Big Archaeology' - entrenched interests prepared to defend privilege is a standard characteristic of any type of gated social organisation, it is not a crazy conspiracy to point this out.
Like when climate deniers come on a show if that show said 99.9% of climate science does not agree with this view. Instead it is usually 1 climate scientist and one idiot which is really not even close to the real distribution.
Given that Jordan Peterson and Rogan are mentioned it should go without saying that the content is made up or not factual.
an interesting question of the labelling - i wonder what Netflix policy is on this, particularly with documentaries like Dahmer series etc being so popular. I think we might find there isn't a hard line to draw between fact vs fiction, it's a spectrum
In any case, Hancock is presenting a theory, to which there may well be elements of interest to merit further investigation. As for 'Big Archaeology' - entrenched interests prepared to defend privilege is a standard characteristic of any type of gated social organisation, it is not a crazy conspiracy to point this out.