Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You don't even need that, the kernel OOM killer would take care of this eventually. Unless its something like Java where the garbage collector would begin to burn CPU.


The OOM killer doesn't restart (randomly, unless configured) killed processes, it just kills.


Unless the OOM-killer kills the wrong process. Ages ago we had a userspace filesystem (gpfs) that was of course one of the oldest processes around and it consumed lots of RAM. When the oom killer started looking for a target, of course one of the mmfsd processes was selected and it resulted in instantaneous machine lockup (any access to that filesystem would be blocked forever in the system call which depended on the userspace daemon to return, alas never returning). Was funny to debug


You can prevent a process from being killed by OOM killer: https://backdrift.org/oom-killer-how-to-create-oom-exclusion...


If it's deployed in K8s, it would be restarted automatically after dying.


Then you have two problems.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: