>I implore you to consider that auditing code is more than just big-O analyses.

That isn't at all what I said nor implied.

You seem to have fooled literally every person replying to your post, then. Perhaps consider that your reactionary post was not quite as "rational" as you'd like to believe, or at least that you haven't yet said what you mean.

>You seem to have fooled literally every person replying to your post, then.

Fooled? No.

>Perhaps consider that your reactionary post was not quite as "rational" as you'd like to believe, or at least that you haven't yet said what you mean.

What part of any of my comments are reactionary? What have I said that I don't mean? I genuinely don't understand.