Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

who are you to decide how "Linux" is supposed to behave by default?

I'm not deciding that, other people made those decisions decades ago. It's a bad idea to mess with defaults for no good reason and then being too lazy to at least package it properly.

Getting mad because Ubuntu's choices are different from choices you might make is just silly.

I couldn't care less about ubuntu, I'm not using it. I just hate to see that mindless crap trickle down into one of the last semi-sane distros (debian). This only leads to forks in the future which means more work for everybody.

Again: If some distro-maintainer wants a fancy motd then great, make it a package and make that package the default for the desktop-install. Don't mess with core-stuff that has stood the test of time since before said maintainer was even born. Down that path lies SuSE linux.



> other people made those decisions decades ago.

This isn't decades ago, and Ubuntu is not Unix. It is Ubuntu. Decisions made decades ago for Unix are not inherently right, and have no special moral authority.

> I couldn't care less about ubuntu, I'm not using it.

Then perhaps you shouldn't speak on the subject. /etc/motd is the least of the things they've "messed with".

Trying to treat a modern operating system as if it's a 1970s operating system is absurd.

> Down that path lies SuSE linux.

There is nothing inherently wrong with SuSE. I don't happen to use it, but there are a lot of things I don't happen to use.

You're stuck in the past. A Unix-centric past, at that. If it works for you, great, but don't pretend we all have to stay there with you.


Not sure what more to say beyond a good old quote; Those who don't understand history are destined to repeat it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: