Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>They do advocate MOND

Which is why I'm asking about MOND, which I just explained in my comment is falsified from the start (violation of existing established physics).



I don't think MOND proponents say the theory is complete, just that alternative gravitation theories is the direction that should be taken for research instead of funding futile dark matter detection projects.


>alternative gravitation theories is the direction that should be taken for research instead of

Why instead of? Dark matter is, so far, the best model we have. Seems sensible to continue research in that direction.

>futile dark matter detection projects.

Why are they futile?


In the context of this article, evaluating the no-dark-matter future is probably in scope.

In general, that statement would require defense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: