I’m afraid I must disagree, at least in part. While I agree that Thomson/Reuters should have put more effort into web interoperability, I am troubled by the use of federal dollars to support the development of a competitive product (even free ones).
We'd better tell the GHC folks to stop working on Haskell! It's cutting into Sun's Java revenue!
Anyway, I wonder what law they are using to prevent the reverse-engineering for interoperability? Last time I checked, that is explicitly allowed by the DMCA. If it is an EULA thing, I would be happy to take credit for reverse-engineering the file format; I have never used EndNote. (BibTeX + emacs is much easier to use.)
I’m afraid I must disagree, at least in part. While I agree that Thomson/Reuters should have put more effort into web interoperability, I am troubled by the use of federal dollars to support the development of a competitive product (even free ones).
We'd better tell the GHC folks to stop working on Haskell! It's cutting into Sun's Java revenue!
Anyway, I wonder what law they are using to prevent the reverse-engineering for interoperability? Last time I checked, that is explicitly allowed by the DMCA. If it is an EULA thing, I would be happy to take credit for reverse-engineering the file format; I have never used EndNote. (BibTeX + emacs is much easier to use.)