This will likely be an unpopular opinion here, but the earth has been experiencing “climate change” since its inception and all the folks panicking over it is an overreaction. Humans will adapt to the earth’s conditions. Yes we’ve impacted the climate. I’m not saying we shouldn’t continue migrating to EVs, etc. But by and large, the earth’s climate is such a complex and massive beast that it’s naïve to think that we can really make a meaningful affect what’s coming. If places become uninhabitable, then humans will migrate elsewhere as we always have. The earth will be here long after humans go extinct (probably) and it will be fine with or without us. The sky is not falling :)
I can't think of both "then humans will migrate elsewhere as we always have" and "The sky is not falling :)" as not a cruel joke. Yes, as a species we'll migrate, while a significant part of families die from hunger, riot violence, live in slum conditions, etc. I mean, we're taking millions of people living in extreme conditions or dying within a few generations. That's very much "the sky is falling".
> a significant part of families die from hunger, riot violence, live in slum conditions
You seem to be under the impression that we’re going over a cliff, rather an be a slow decline/collapse. What evidence do you have to support that? I’m not saying I don’t believe you, but we’ve had a long history of predicting eco-doomsday, but we’re still here. https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-poca...
Migrating a few hundred million people over a span of a couple of decades from areas where agriculture becomes impossible is "going over a cliff". Look what a few hundred thousand refugees did to European politics. We have nuclear weapons now. People will not quietly starve.
Yes the Earth has been experiencing climate change forever. But it's extremely obvious that humans are changing the climate in such a way they we will create an unliveable environment across many places on earth. That will most likely lead to billions dying, world wars and maybe collapse of civilization. Of course earth itself will be fine. But that is hardly a benchmark. Even if we nuke every square kilometer of earth it's still fine. it's just a large piece of rock.
So you say yes humans can affect the climate but we can't affect what's coming? That seems ascientific. If the models are right then we did cause the climate to change and we can bend its path into the future.
We've spent what the last 50-100 years affecting the climate significantly...and we think we can stop/reverse it in how long? Just because we wish it, does not mean we can materially affect it in a relatively short horizon.
Beyond the idea that we can somehow reduce our current impact, the human population will continue to increase to what, up to 11-13 billion by 2100. Those people will need food, water, goods and services. I won't be around to see year 2100, but I venture to say it's going to be warmer than it is today and there's not a damn thing we can realistically do about it.
i suggest you go explain your opinion to poor countries experiencing climate related crop failure and famine this year. i'd also suggest you inform yourself with the relevant literature, IPCC's AR6 is a good start.
As a physicist i would be glad you explain me your reasoning a bit further, for instance how the droughts is independent from climate. You look very knowledgeable.
This is borderline climate denial, not "calm and reasonable". If you want to tell yourself that things are somehow gonna be fine, then feel free to go ahead. It just doesn't line up with an absolutely overwhelming scientific consensus.
It is not borderline. It is out-and-out denial. People like that will, ultimately, be personally responsible for collapse when it comes, but they will be better insulated from consequences than their victims.
I denied nothing. I simply stated that climate change is business as usual. Have we as humans impacted it, yes. But we’ll either adapt or die. How is that a denial?
