Since both Zeta and Anonymous cannot be made to suffer the same gains or losses together its zero sum instead of nonzero sum.
anonymous is minimizing the maximum loss by releasing all information on cartel's activities including not only pay offs to law officers and others but also information on their families as it is a non zero game between more than two players with the third player being zeta's competition.
Translation, Zeta got played and schooled.
If there turns out to be more things or issues involved than it becomes a nonzero sum game with the same nonzero sum equations and n+1 being the profit or loss. In other words if the US or Mexican government decides to get involved on a side than it leans towards a non zero game with more than 4 participants as the loose collections of actors representing either government than becomes non-cohesive collection of more than one actor in the equations.
Anonymous is playing a zero sum game here folks..surprised that not one of you picked that up yet..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero%E2%80%93sum_game
Since both Zeta and Anonymous cannot be made to suffer the same gains or losses together its zero sum instead of nonzero sum.
anonymous is minimizing the maximum loss by releasing all information on cartel's activities including not only pay offs to law officers and others but also information on their families as it is a non zero game between more than two players with the third player being zeta's competition.
Translation, Zeta got played and schooled.
If there turns out to be more things or issues involved than it becomes a nonzero sum game with the same nonzero sum equations and n+1 being the profit or loss. In other words if the US or Mexican government decides to get involved on a side than it leans towards a non zero game with more than 4 participants as the loose collections of actors representing either government than becomes non-cohesive collection of more than one actor in the equations.